
Data current as of January 2025 | UK charging infrastructure data from GOV.UK
If you're responsible for EV charging infrastructure decisions, whether as a local authority, property developer, fleet operator, or business owner, you're making choices now that will define your position for the rest of the decade.
The numbers tell part of the story and set clear targets, such as 300,000 public charging points by 2030, helping stakeholders stay focused on planning goals.
But the real questions aren't about hitting government targets. They're about making decisions that still make sense in 2028, when vehicle capabilities have changed, usage patterns have shifted, and the competitive landscape looks completely different from today.
This guide addresses strategic planning for EV charging infrastructure through to 2030. Not the usual surface level overview that repeats government press releases, but the practical considerations that determine whether your infrastructure investment delivers value or becomes an expensive mistake.
Understanding the starting point helps with realistic planning. Note that charging infrastructure is growing rapidly (37% during 2024), so statistics become outdated quickly.
The UK had approximately 73,000 public charging devices as of January 2025, with the network growing by 37% during 2024 alone. By November 2025, this figure had risen to over 87,000 devices. This includes around 14,500 rapid chargers (those at 50kW and above, representing 20% of the total) and roughly 59,000 slower destination chargers at locations where vehicles park for extended periods.

Scotland's achievement deserves particular attention. Transport Scotland confirmed in October 2024 that Scotland had reached 6,007 public charge points, surpassing its 6,000 target two years ahead of the 2026 deadline. The network grew by 49% between June 2023 and October 2024, supported by a £30 million EV Infrastructure Fund for local authorities. Scotland has now set a new target of 24,000 additional charge points by 2030.
The distribution isn't just London centric. It's heavily skewed towards affluent areas with newer housing stock and commercial centres. Rural areas, older housing estates, and regions with lower car ownership have far fewer charging options.
This creates a genuine barrier to EV adoption in areas that could benefit most from lower running costs. Someone in central Edinburgh can easily find a charger; someone in an ex-mining town in County Durham faces an entirely different situation.
According to the RAC Foundation's 'Still Standing Still' report, approximately 35% of UK households lack off-street parking (or alternatively, 65% have or could accommodate off-street parking). Field Dynamics research puts the figure at 6,642,000 households (24.6%) without space to park and charge off-street. The variation reflects different methodologies and definitions.
The situation is considerably worse in urban areas:
These households can't install home chargers and depend entirely on public infrastructure. Current provision doesn't come close to meeting this need. On-street charging remains patchy, expensive, and often inconvenient compared to home charging.
Emerging solution: Cross-pavement charging. In July 2025, London Councils published new guidance on cross-pavement EV charging solutions, which allow residents without driveways to charge at home using either surface 'gullies' or buried cable systems. The government has allocated £25 million in funding for local authorities to install these solutions. Installation costs typically range from £1,000 to £1,500 and take 1.5 to 3 hours to complete.
The mix of charger types matters.
The UK has prioritised rapid charging, particularly along motorway corridors. That makes sense for long-distance travel. But destination charging at everyday locations remains underdeveloped relative to need.
Government targets provide context.
The government expects 300,000 public charging points by 2030, a target set out in the March 2022 Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Strategy. Analysis from ChargeUK and the National Infrastructure Commission suggests the UK is on track if current growth rates continue.
This breaks down roughly into: thousands of rapid chargers along motorway and trunk road networks; tens of thousands of rapid chargers at fuel stations and hub locations; and the remainder as destination chargers at shops, workplaces, and residential areas.
These aren't mandates. They're projections based on assumed EV adoption rates and charging behaviour. Whether they're achievable depends entirely on commercial investment and local authority action.
Important funding change: The original £950 million Rapid Charging Fund for motorway infrastructure was scrapped in June 2025. Originally announced by Rishi Sunak in March 2020 with plans for 6,000+ rapid and ultra-rapid chargers at motorway services by 2035, the pilot was delayed multiple times before being cancelled entirely. The Department for Transport cited lack of interest from motorway service operators and noted that private investment had already quadrupled the rapid/ultra-rapid charging network between 2021 and 2024. The £400 million has been redirected towards on-street residential charging provision instead.
New petrol and diesel car sales end in 2030 (with hybrids allowed until 2035). This target was formally reinstated on 6 January 2025 after a brief delay under the previous government. This drives everything else. If new vehicles are predominantly electric from 2030 onwards, the charging infrastructure needs to be primarily in place by then, not just planned, but actually installed and operational.
The ZEV Mandate became law on 3 January 2024, placing legally binding quotas on manufacturers for EV sales:
The 2024 targets were 22% for cars and 10% for vans, with the actual EV market share reaching 19.6%. The 2025 targets rise to 28% for cars and 16% for vans.
April 2025 updates introduced several flexibilities: non-compliance penalties reduced from £15,000 to £12,000 per car and from £18,000 to £15,000 per van; borrowing provisions were extended to 2029; and CO2 credit transfer provisions were extended. Small manufacturers (under 2,500 cars per year) remain exempt until 2035. No manufacturers paid fines in 2024 due to the available flexibilities.
Councils have duties under the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 to provide charging infrastructure in their areas. The specifics remain vague, with 'appropriate provision' offering no precise guidance. But the direction is clear: this is a local authority responsibility, whether they have the budget for it or not.
Planning requires understanding available funding, its limitations, and how it's likely to evolve.
The LEVI fund provides capital grants to local authorities for charging infrastructure in residential areas. The total allocation is £381 million, comprising £343 million for chargepoint installation and £37.8 million for local authority capability building.
What it covers:
What it doesn't cover:
The reality: LEVI funding helps but doesn't come close to covering full infrastructure needs. The first LEVI-funded installations began in September 2025, with over 100,000 local chargepoints expected from the programme. However, progress has been slower than hoped: by October 2024, only 10 of 78 projects had been approved against a March 2025 deadline. Councils need to supplement this funding with commercial partnerships and revenue from charging operations.
Businesses and charities can claim grants covering 75% of total costs (purchase and installation including VAT) for workplace charging infrastructure:
Over 1,400 sockets have been installed at UK schools and colleges through this scheme. Applicants must use OZEV-approved installers and have designated off-street parking.
This separate scheme for SMEs (businesses with 249 or fewer employees) provides:
Both schemes close on 31 March 2026. Planning around specific grant programmes requires accepting that terms change frequently. Don't build a strategy around funding that might not exist in 18 months.
Most charging infrastructure will ultimately be commercially funded. Understanding viable business models matters more than chasing grants.
Direct ownership: You fund and own the infrastructure, keeping all revenue. This works if you have capital available and expect utilisation sufficient to generate acceptable returns.
Typical costs:
Charge point operator partnerships: A CPO installs, owns, and operates the infrastructure on your site. You provide the location and potentially the power supply, but don't fund the hardware or costs associated with maintenance and replacement. Revenue share varies based on contributions. This model reduces your capital requirement to near zero whilst still providing charging facilities. The trade-off is lower revenue per session since the CPO takes a share.
Lease arrangements: You own the chargers but lease management and operations to a specialist provider. This keeps you in control of the asset whilst outsourcing technical complexity.
Advertising-funded: Some models use advertising on charging stations to offset installation and operating costs. This works in high-footfall locations but isn't realistic everywhere.
.jpg)
Councils face the challenge of providing infrastructure with limited funding, uncertain demand projections, and political pressure to move quickly.
The temptation is to install chargers wherever grant funding permits. This can create patchy provision that doesn't serve actual need.
Better approach: Start with a proper needs assessment by asking these questions:
You can't install chargers everywhere at once. Prioritisation matters.
How you procure infrastructure affects what you get and how much it costs:
Charging infrastructure has ongoing costs: electricity, maintenance, network management, and customer support. Grant funding might cover installation, but who pays for operations?
Commercial organisations face different drivers and constraints from local authorities.
Get clear on your objectives. Different goals require different approaches:
Workplace installations differ from public charging in essential ways:
Every site’s needs will be different, but starting with 10-15% of parking spaces with charging and planning electrical capacity for 30-40%. This gives you headroom without massive upfront costs.
Customer-facing charging follows a different logic.
Hotels and similar accommodations have particular opportunities.
The infrastructure you install now needs to work well through 2030 and beyond. Some technology decisions affect long-term viability more than others.
Install OCPP-compliant infrastructure. This protects your investment by allowing you to switch management platforms if needed.
Proprietary systems look attractive initially, perhaps with lower upfront cost or integration with other services you use. But they create permanent dependency on a single vendor. Over a 10+ year lifespan, that dependency will cost you far more than any initial savings.
Bigger isn't always better:
.jpg)
Installing unnecessarily powerful chargers wastes money on installation if you’re funding the project, increases ongoing electricity costs, and risks being too expensive and mismatched to customer needs. Match power to actual use cases.
You can't predict exactly what 2030 will look like. But you can make sensible choices:
Getting power to charging infrastructure proves more difficult than many people expect.
Adding EV chargers obviously increases electrical demand. The question is whether your existing electrical supply can handle it.
Simple calculation:
If your existing supply can't support the planned charging infrastructure, you need a grid connection upgrade:
Meaningful change since April 2023: Under Access SCR rules, demand customers no longer pay for DNO network reinforcement, only extension assets connecting to your site. This has reduced costs significantly for many installations.
Timelines: Plan on 6-18 months from application to energisation for complex upgrades. ChargeUK reports substantial bottlenecks at some DNOs, so factor this into your project timeline.
Smart charging can reduce or eliminate the need for grid upgrades.
Rather than providing full power to every charger simultaneously, load management distributes available power intelligently. If you have 100kW available and ten 7kW chargers, the system ensures the total draw stays below 100kW by dynamically adjusting the power of individual chargers.
The trade-off: Users might experience slower charging during peak periods. For workplace charging where vehicles park all day, this doesn't matter. For rapid charging, where people want speed, it's more problematic.
Installing infrastructure is just the beginning. Ongoing operations determine whether your investment delivers value.
Charging infrastructure requires maintenance. Connectors wear out. Software needs updates. Things break.
Have a straightforward process for handling faults and a contractor who can respond within 24-48 hours. Target 95%+ uptime as a minimum.
How users interact with your charging infrastructure affects whether they use it again.
Learning from others' expensive errors beats making them yourself:
The next five years will see more change in EV charging infrastructure than the previous decade.
EV charging infrastructure decisions you make now affect your position for the rest of the decade.
Install the wrong technology or in the wrong locations, and you've wasted capital on stranded assets. Choose vendors with proprietary systems, and you're locked in for 10+ years with no negotiating power.
But get it right, installing appropriately sized infrastructure in locations serving real need, using open standards that protect your investment, and you're well positioned regardless of how the details evolve.
The planning matters more than specific predictions. Build in flexibility. Avoid lock-in. Start with clear objectives. Make decisions that remain defensible even if circumstances change.
That's the strategic approach that works through to 2030 and beyond.