.jpg)
The UK's 99% uptime mandate for rapid chargers is now in force, with the first compliance reports due on 14 January 2026. A 2025 Monta survey of over 200 UK charge point operator decision-makers reveals only 3.9% currently meet the threshold. While networks claim an uptime of 98–99%, US research from ChargerHelp found that the actual first-time charging success rate is just 71%. Nearly one in three charging attempts fails.
For commercial property owners, local authorities, and fleet operators selecting EV charging partners, understanding the actual state of charging reliability has never mattered more.
The Public Charge Point Regulations 2023 came into force on 24 November 2023, with a one-year lead time for the reliability requirement. Since November 2024, all rapid charging networks (50kW and above) must achieve 99% average annual reliability.
The regulations measure reliability using OCPI 2.2.1 protocol status codes. A charger is considered reliable when it shows Available, Charging, or Reserved status. Payment terminal failures count as downtime, since contactless payment has been mandatory for all new public chargers 8kW and above since November 2024.
Operators can claim exemptions for vandalism, severe weather, or grid failures, but only with documented evidence reviewed by the Office for Product Safety and Standards.
Penalties:
The 2025 Monta survey paints a stark picture:
Zest operates the UK's largest in-house charge point operator team, enabling rapid response to maintenance issues across our network of 1,300+ charging locations.
Looking across at the US market, ChargerHelp's analysis of over 100,000 charging sessions across 2,400 US chargers found networks claiming 98.7–99.9% uptime delivered only a 71% first-time charge success rate. More than a third of failures occurred on chargers that appeared operational.
Technical availability and functional reliability are fundamentally different metrics.
ChargerHelp's year-over-year analysis found that first-time charge success rates drop from 85% at newly installed stations to below 70% by year three. This 15-point decline stems from hardware not designed for ongoing software updates, chargers unable to handle vehicle protocol changes, and firmware limitations that accumulate.
Hardware swaps and site refreshes may temporarily improve metrics, but don't address the underlying reliability architecture. Organisations should prioritise partners with demonstrated long-term performance records and modular designs that accommodate future requirements.
Kempower's analysis of over 13 million charging sessions (2018–2024) reveals:
User-oriented failures: 81% of all failures
Technical failures: 19% of all failures
Simpler authentication and more precise instructions could address most charging failures. Zest addresses this through multiple payment options, including contactless payment, app-based charging, and integration with platforms like Octopus Electroverse.
%20(7).jpg)
Repair times vary enormously. Best-in-class operators achieve repairs in under 5 hours; typical DC fast charger repairs can stretch to several weeks when parts availability constrains the process.
Remote diagnostics represent the single most impactful factor in reducing repair times. Platforms using predictive algorithms can resolve a significant proportion of issues remotely before escalating to technician dispatch.
Typical maintenance costs:
With fully funded EV charging solutions, site owners can transfer operational and maintenance responsibility to their charging partner while avoiding capital expenditure.
The UK's 99% reliability mandate is among the most stringent globally.
United States: The NEVI Formula Program requires a minimum 97% uptime for federally-funded chargers, measured on a rolling 12-month average per individual port.
European Union: AFIR contains no EU-wide uptime mandate, though national and local tenders increasingly specify requirements of 97–99%.
Key differences:
Norway:
Netherlands:
Both markets demonstrate that comprehensive charging ecosystems, strong payment interoperability, and quality hardware deliver results. The IEA Global EV Outlook 2025 provides further analysis of international developments in charging infrastructure.
For fleet operators, charging downtime creates cascading costs: missed routes, schedule disruptions, and premium costs when forced to use backup public infrastructure. Industry surveys indicate that many fleet operators cannot recover from charging failures within 4 hours.
For destination charging at retail and hospitality venues, working chargers increase dwell time and customer spending. The inverse risk of unreliable chargers damaging brand reputation rarely appears in procurement calculations but represents a substantial hidden cost.
Commercial property values are increasingly reflecting the quality of charging infrastructure, with surveys indicating that a majority of companies now favour offices with charging facilities.
%20(6).jpg)
Commercial property owners:
Since Zest manages the end-to-end service, including maintenance, commercial landowners don’t need to consider ongoing maintenance costs. Learn about Zest's commercial property partnerships
Local authorities:
Zest has delivered successful partnerships with Transport for London, Hackney Council, Portsmouth City Council and many other local authorities across the UK.
Fleet operators:
A gap between regulatory ambition and operational reality characterises the UK's EV charging reliability landscape in 2026. The 99% uptime mandate is now enforceable, yet fewer than 4% of operators currently achieve it.
First-time charging success rates can be substantially lower than claimed uptime figures. Charger performance degrades significantly from year one to year three, making long-term reliability architecture more important than initial procurement costs.
Operators with demonstrated strong performance, predictive maintenance capabilities, meaningful SLA terms, and modular hardware designs will be best positioned for the growing EV market. Those selecting partners based primarily on upfront cost face compounding costs in lost revenue, operational disruption, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.
Get in touch to discuss your EV charging requirements.